On November 2, 1964, the premises owned by the Swiss Precision Instruments Company were also burglarized. Their value at dealer's cost was slightly under $15,000. The missing merchandise included straight and stagger-tooth key set cutters, center drills and lengths, arbor type cutters, and T-slot cutters. Our review of the record has disclosed the absence of error and the presence of overwhelming evidence of appellant's guilt.Ī warehouse owned by the Rochlin Company, an exclusive factory representative for several lines of machine tools, was burglarized on July 9, 1964. We have concluded that appellant's contentions are without merit. Thinking putty full#Appellant further contends that he was denied his "constitutional right of equal protection" by reason of the trial court's refusal to order preparation of a full reporter's transcript to assist his substituted counsel in arguing his motion for a new trial. Code, § 1237.) Prior convictions of burglary and grand theft were admitted by appellant.Īppellant contends that his oral incriminating statements were improperly received in evidence because (1) there was insufficient evidence aliunde these statements to establish the corpus delicti and (2) the undercover officers who were negotiating with appellant for the purchase of the stolen items failed to advise him of his constitutional rights as required by People v. His purported appeal from the order denying his motion for new trial must be dismissed. George, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.ĭefendant appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his conviction of receiving stolen property in violation of Penal Code section 496. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Ronald M. EDWARD DEE PUTTY, Defendant and Appellant.Īrthur Mabry, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |